All datasets / NWeak
NWeak/emails-user-study
The declared licence (cc-by-4.0) is classified as permissive.
- Declared licence
- cc-by-4.0, from the tagEvidence: README.md at 76b11d8
- Licence files
- No licence file at the top level of the repositoryEvidence: file list at 76b11d8
- Declared sources
- None listed in the card metadata
- Access gated on Hugging Face
- No
Citation text from the card
The emails themselves are **not ours**. They come from the **PhishingSpamDataSet** of Toth, Bisztray and Dubniczky, released under CC-BY-4.0 and redistributed here under that licence: > Rebeka Toth, Tamas Bisztray, Richard A. Dubniczky. > *Constructing and Benchmarking: a Labeled Email Dataset for Text-Based > Phishing and Spam Detection Framework.* > [arXiv:2511.21448](https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21448) | > [github.com/DataPhish/PhishingSpamDataSet](https://github.com/DataPhish/PhishingSpamDataSet) Theirs: `Subject`, `Body`, `Sender`, `URL(s)`, `Type`, `Created by`, `Source`, `Year`, and the `LLM detected emotion` / `LLM detected motivation` annotations. Ours: the filtering and split, the embeddings, the 6-concept merge, and the trained models' outputs. Please cite Toth et al. alongside our paper if you use this data. **Note:** `Sender` and `Body` are real email content carried over from the source dataset. Produced for **[Are Concept Bottleneck Models Effective as Decision-Support Systems?](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25581)** (arXiv:2608.25581) -- Bogani, Debole, Marconato, Pugnana, Tentori, Passerini. Code: [github.com/debryu/user-study-CBMs](https://github.com/debryu/user-study-CBMs).
The same facts for your agent
A free MCP server at mcp.datalicense.uk/mcp. Connect it from an MCP client such as Claude or Cursor.
dataset_licence({ "id": "NWeak/emails-user-study" })
signal: "permissive"
stated_licence: "cc-by-4.0"
sources: 0