All datasets / project-works
project-works/ComicVQA
The declared licence (mit) is classified as permissive.
- Declared licence
- mit, from the tagEvidence: README.md at 5a36582
- Licence files
- No licence file at the top level of the repositoryEvidence: file list at 5a36582
- Declared sources
- None listed in the card metadata
- Access gated on Hugging Face
- No
Citation text from the card
@inproceedings{gan-etal-2026-comicvqa,
title = "{C}omic{VQA}: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning in Multimodal {LLM}s",
author = "Gan, Esther and
Brown, Hannah and
Herel, David and
Kawaguchi, Kenji and
Kan, Min-Yen and
Shieh, Michael Qizhe",
editor = "Liakata, Maria and
Moreira, Viviane P. and
Zhang, Jiajun and
Jurgens, David",
booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {ACL} 2026",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, United States",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-acl.1268/",
pages = "25347--25370",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-395-1",
abstract = "We introduce Comic Visual Question Answering (\textbf{ComicVQA}), a comics-based benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on visual reasoning. ComicVQA comprises of (i) \textbf{Missing Panel Prediction}, testing fine-grained visual grounding and (ii) \textbf{Panel Sorting}, which evaluates sequential narrative understanding. Proprietary models achieve up to 62.6{\%} on Missing Panel Prediction and 46.4{\%} on Panel Sorting, whereas open-source models reach only 47.7{\%} and 26.9{\%}, respectively. In contrast, human annotators achieve over 83{\%} accuracy on both tasks, revealing a large gap between current models and human-level multimodal understanding in comics. Through controlled ordering ablations and a detailed err
The same facts for your agent
A free MCP server at mcp.datalicense.uk/mcp. Connect it from an MCP client such as Claude or Cursor.
dataset_licence({ "id": "project-works/ComicVQA" })
signal: "permissive"
stated_licence: "mit"
sources: 0